Home > Articles > Dust Collection & OSHA Silica

Dust Collection & OSHA Silica

///
Comments are Off

As seen in the Fall 2017 Issue

It’s here, OSHA has issued their new Silica Dust Standard. Compliance for construction is starting now with more industries to follow. One of the distinct advantages of the construction standard is the easy and straightforward compliance options offered in Table 1*. 

What is Table 1*? First, it’s important to understand that the rule lays out two options for controlling dust. Option 1 is, in short, control silica with your own methods and then measure your employee’s silica exposure through medical testing and other methods, which can be out of reach for some construction businesses. Option 2 is to follow the dust control methods in Table 1 of the construction standard. For many businesses, especially smaller businesses Table 1 may be the better choice. Plus, according to OSHA’s fact sheet, those who follow Table 1 correctly are not required to measure workers’ exposure to silica and are not subject to the PEL.

Table 1* shows dust control methods for many common operations. Several tools must be equipped with an integrated water delivery system that continuously feeds water to the blade or bit. This makes compliance on these operations pretty straightforward. However, other operations have different requirements. Things like cutting Fiber Cement Board, Tuck-pointing, Dowel Drilling and using Handheld and Stand-Mounted Drills require a Dust Shroud and a connection to a Dust Collector. Jackhammers and chipping tools like Hammer Drills as well as Handheld Grinders and Walk-behind Floor Grinders can use water or a dust collector.

An interesting point is the requirements Table 1* place on handheld grinders for Tuck-pointing and for “Other Purposes”. It states the vacuum should have 25 CFM per inch of blade diameter. So for example, Pulse-Bac recommends a 550 model vacuum that produces 150CFM for tuck-pointing with a 4-5” grinding wheel, meeting the Table 1 standard. That same 550 model previously worked great for a grinder with a 7” cup wheel. However, according to the new rule, the 7” grinder would now require 51 more CFM for a total of 175 CFM, even though before the 550 had been a very effective solution. Now the user must move up to something like a Pulse-Bac 1050 model, which is not only more powerful but larger overall.

Along with the requirement for using a dust collector, Table 1 also places requirements on the dust collector itself. The following appears almost everywhere a dust collector is called for.

“(the)Dust collector must provide the air flow recommended by the tool manufacturer, or greater, and have a filter with 99% or greater efficiency and a filter-cleaning mechanism”.


To better define what this means we’ll look at the text preceding Table 1*. First, let’s address filter efficiency. The text shows that OSHA had originally considered requiring HEPA filters like those used with lead paint & asbestos, which provide 99.97% filter efficiency @.3 microns since they provide better respiratory protection. However, OSHA found that many HEPA filters clog quickly and that there were more filter options close to HEPA available, allowing the standard to be more easily implemented. This is why OSHA went with a lower filter efficiency of 99%. However, vacuums like Pulse-Bac feature HEPA filters to provide the best protection and with the automatic pulse cleaning, filter clogging is a non-issue regardless of filter efficiency.  So, when you’re looking at filtration from a compliance standpoint, while a HEPA filter will provide better protection, you’re the only obligation is a filter that provides at least 99% filtration(X). The table is ambiguous as to the particle size(Y) to be filtered (filter efficiency = X% @ Y micron), but to be safe it may be good to find something in the 0.3-0.9 micron range, as this would fit what is discussed in the preceding text.

Now let’s look at the second part of the requirement, that the dust collector be equipped with a filter-cleaning mechanism. A “filter-cleaning mechanism” could mean a lot of different things, so we need to interpret what the expectation may be. Here again we turn to preceding text. There we find OSHA saw that fine silica dust would quickly clog standard vacuums.  They looked at data from NIOSH,

“NIOSH pointed out that a reverse pulse feature on a dust collector should preclude the need to remove filters for cleaning. OSHA agrees and has included the specification for a filter cleaning mechanism”.

Other statements provide further insight “the filter(s) on the vacuum must be cleaned or changed as frequently as necessary in order to ensure they remain effective (it may be necessary to activate a back-pulse filter cleaning mechanism several times during the course of a shift).”  and “ regular stops to conduct the proper reverse air pulse filter cleaning procedure were crucial …”.

This makes it clear that filter cleaning is an important part of the requirement of Table 1 and the filters will need to be cleaned frequently to be in compliance. While this may slow work down, a vacuum with an automatic pulse cleaning feature will eliminate the need for monitoring and work stoppage for manual cleaning.

Table 1* seems to show, although now regulated, a lot of these requirements can be met with fairly common practices. For example, many people already use a vacuum with a concrete grinder. Now they just need to make sure it has the right filter efficiency, a filter cleaning mechanism, and the correct CFM. They might want a vacuum that does the work of filter cleaning automatically to avoid frequently stopping work to push a button, shake or change a filter. However, these are things that provide benefit and convenience regardless of the rule. Pulse-Bac vacuums meet all of the requirements and recommendation set forth in the new Silica Standard and provide more features to make work safer and easier.
Learn more at http://www.pulsebac.com

*To view Table 1 from the New  OSHA Silica Dust Standard got to:
https://www.osha.gov/silica/factsheets/OSHA_FS-3681_Silica_Construction.v2.html

You may also like
U.S. Department of Labor and Pottery Manufacturer Reach Settlement Agreement Following Worker Fatality
OSHA Cites Connecticut Contractor for Mercury and Respirator Hazards at New Hampshire Demolition Site
Construction Spending Sets Record In October with Monthly Increases in Public and Outlays but infrastructure Spending Lags 2016 Totals
OSHA Extends Compliance Date for Electronically Submitting Injury, Illness Reports to December 15, 2017